Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Sep 26

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
9/26/2005 6:43 AM 

Friday's announcement that William J. McDonough, Chairman of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, will be stepping down on November 30 (sooner, if his replacement is found before then), sent ripples of speculation through the accounting community.


Why now? Is there something afoot? Another shoe to drop?



I don't think so. My guess is that the PCAOB is starting to mature, and there isn't the same kind of urgency to keep McDonough satisfied. He's a pretty dynamic fellow, not one driven by the calendar; he's a "young" 71-year-old. As he put it in the PCAOB announcement: “I have a wide range of interests in corporate governance, finance and international affairs and will explore one or a variety of activities in those fields; I enjoy perfect health and have not the slightest interest in retiring, now or ever.”




The rumor mill has buzzed about McDonough's pending departure for months; one story had it that he was interested in running Fannie Mae. Maybe something like that is on his horizon, but I'm more interested in who heads up the PCAOB next. That might tell us more about its status.


***************




Incidentally, in an interview with the Financial Times, McDonough warned the auditing profession that they shouldn't expect lawmakers to support any legislation that caps auditor liability. "I do not think the American people would support legislative remediation of the auditor's risk until the audit profession has really won back the confidence of the public," said Mr McDonough...


Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.