Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Sep 26

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
9/26/2005 7:33 PM 

Delta Air Lines' bankruptcy on September 14 has flushed out a couple of impairment charges by a couple of other players - ones that had invested in leasing aircraft to the Atlanta icon.

Your first guess might have been a bank or leasing institution - and that would have been a bad guess. The day after the bankruptcy filing, Electronic Data Systems filed a "material impairments" 8-K disclosing its $26 million writedown of leases to Delta.

Another one emerged today, this one out of the House of Mouse: Disney. Not the first lending institution that jumps to mind, their writeoff was $68 million. They also noted the possibility of an acceleration of $100 million of tax payments should Delta successfully shuck the leases during its Chapter 11 rehab session.

Nothing skanky about the two transactions at all; in fact, Delta was noted as being a lessee in the 10-K filings of both companies. It's just a reminder of how broadly intertwined American business can be at times. It can't help but make you wonder a little bit about the wisdom of diversification: the portfolio manager who diligently avoids airlines because they're in such difficult straits might nonetheless still be exposed to them by his or her show biz investments - a business that's supposed to be stable and growing.

It also makes you wonder about the degree of interdependence among firms when it comes to derivative transactions. Guess we'll find out the next time one dissolves.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.