Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Aug 25

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
8/25/2005 6:47 AM 

Yesterday, PricewaterhouseCoopers released one of its quarterly "Management Barometer" surveys of over 147 CFOs and Managing Directors, of which 71 (48%), are associated with firms having a defined benefit pension plan. Purpose of the survey: what do you really think about your defined benefit pension plans?

A small sample, for sure. Yet the findings are pretty consistent with what you'd expect:

- The top concern of 73% of large employers with a defined benefit pension plan report that their number-one concern is expense and funding volatility.

- Most firms - 67% of them that made a plan change during the past three years, or expect to do so - consider freezing it or closing it to new hires as viable options for handling the volatility concerns.

- About half of the firms planning changes within the next 12 months will consider terminating their plan.


Reform of pension plan reporting is likely - and it will likely increase cost volatility. Continued worship of that bitch-goddess "smooth earnings" will lead cowardly managements to abandon an employee benefit that they once considered to be an attractive way to reward and retain valued employees.

(As long as they didn't have to clearly report what it cost...)

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.