Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Aug 24

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
8/24/2005 7:54 AM 

Quite a while ago, I mentioned a pair of "higher education" schools that had a little trouble with how to account for revenue - Career Education Corporation and Investools.They've been joined by another for-profit school chain: yesterday, Corinthian Colleges filed a non-reliance 8-K covering its annual financials from 2001 to 2004, and the first three quarters of fiscal 2005.

Corinthian had a couple of problems in its revenue accounting. One, it didn't consistently account for the pro rata portion of revenue of students starting classes after the beginning of the month. Sometimes, it accounted for the revenue on a pro rata daily basis, which is a precise way of doing things; sometimes it included a whole month of revenue no matter when the student started in the month.

The inconsistency was due to the fact that the "legacy" Corinthian Colleges firm accounted for revenue on a monthly basis, while some of the firms it acquired accounted for revenue on a daily pro rata basis. Apparently, the firm didn't mesh the two conflicting systems together at acquisition. If you're looking for examples of where accounting controls took a back seat to growth by acquisition, include this one.

The second revenue issue had to do with "externships," one of the bugaboos at Career Education Corporation. Upon completing their "in-house" studies, students enter an externship afterwards. Corinthian recognized student revenue over the period ending with the in-house studies, instead of the longer period including the end of the externship. That has the effect of recognizing revenue earlier than when Corinthian's services have been completely delivered to the student.




The revised financials will incorporate a mid-month convention for revenue recognition, with a half month of revenue recognized in both the initial month and the final month of attendance - and tuition revenue will be recognized through the end of each student's externship period.


Cumulative effects: retained earnings at the end of fiscal 2004 will decrease by approximately $16.9 million. About 52% of the impact is related to the mid-month convention and the rest is related to extending revenue recognition through the externship period. Diluted net earnings per share will decrease by approximately $0.04, $0.04 and $0.06 for the fiscal years ended 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, and $0.04, $0.00 and $0.01, for the quarters ended September 30, 2004, December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, respectively.

The amounts involved aren't necessarily small on a relative basis: the company earned $.44, $.72 and $.87 in years 2002 through 2004. That's an overstatement of 9%, 6% and 7% in those respective years. Value Line shows an average annual P/E ratio of 25.6, 26.6 and 33.6 during those three years - so even small overstatements could have a significant effects on the company's market cap. At those multiples, the incremental earnings were worth about a buck of share price in 2002 and 2003, and two bucks in 2004.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.