Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
May 24

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
5/24/2006 5:55 AM 

The only accounting issue on most folks' radar is backdated options. It's a big world out there, and there's more than one way to improve financial reporting. The same people flailing wildly now for backdaters were probably the same ones thrashing around over underfunded benefit plans a few years ago...

Anyway. In the past, I've mentioned FASB's proposal for making benefit plan obligations more visible in corporate balance sheets, and the comments on the proposal are due in a week. You might want to check out the crop of responses received so far and write your own; mine's here. So far, the biggest corporate gripe seems to be the elimination of the three-month gap permitted between plan measurement and the balance sheet date.

Blogs will be a bit light for a while. I'm working on a king-sized Analyst's Accounting Observer report on benefit plans, including the effects of this proposal on the S&P 500. It's been a time sucker, hence, the light blogging. If you care to see the report when I'm done - and there will be a time when people are concerned with things like this, and not just option backdaters - I invite you to sign up for a trial subscription here. (Please, institutional investors only.)

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.