Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Mar 21

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
3/21/2007 5:59 AM 

Monday, AES Corporation issued a non-reliance 8-K covering its financials for 2006 to date and the years ended 2005, 2004, and 2003.

The company is still investigating, but it will restate for a variety of reasons. From the 8-K:

"The errors identified by the Company relate primarily to the following categories, which may change before the accounting review is finalized:
· Accounting for derivatives
· Capitalization
· Certain errors, including depreciation adjustments in the Company's subsidiaries, C.A. La Electricidad de Caracas and AES Eletropaulo
· Share-based compensation, including stock option and restricted stock unit awards
· Income tax expense

Many of these errors were identified as a result of the Company's continuing remediation of previously identified material weaknesses. Other errors were discovered during the Company's quarterly and year end accounting reviews. All errors that have been presently identified result in non-cash adjustments."


Note the near-obligatory mantra: "All errors that have been presently identified result in non-cash adjustments." That doesn't mean they won't matter: it'll be interesting to see how widely the revised earnings vary from the original. And it's interesting to note that the errors were uncovered during the remediation of control weaknesses noted in the 2005 audit. The "Controls" part of last year's filing listed an amazing number of flaws, and you can see how it took over a year to work them all out. The late filing for 2006 and revocation of the prior years' financial are just more evidence that internal controls matter... to companies of all sizes.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.