Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Feb 27

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
2/27/2007 7:02 AM 

And be done with it. This continuous deadline-pushing of Sarbanes-Oxley compliance deadlines is just a complete sham.

On second thought ... nahhh.

CFO.com reports that in a letter to SEC Chairman Christopher Cox and PCAOB Chairman Mark Olson, "Senators John Kerry and Olympia Snowe called for an extension in the deadline for companies of less than $75 million in market capitalization to comply with Sarbox 404 rules."

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed in 2002. Big boys have been complying since 2004. And it looks like we've got a gigantic cadre of Peter Pan companies that refuse to grow up. Companies with market caps of less than $75 million have had their deadline for Section 404 management reports extended to 10-Ks for years ending on or after December 15, 2007; their auditors' attestation reports on the same don't show for another year after that.

The Senators want to give them another year. We've seen this movie before, and we'll probably see it again.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.