Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Dec 14

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
12/14/2006 6:43 AM 

Back at last from the AICPA SEC/PCAOB Conference ... and a good time was had by all.

Well, at least by me. While it may sound like a mundane affair, it's good to see so many faces that you don't see any other time of year. And good to actually meet some of the people who read this blog. (Thanks for introducing yourselves. And thanks for reading.)

And what could be more fun to discuss around the holidays than accounting, auditing and ... XBRL?

Whew. I need some real holiday cheer, and quickly.

This will be a brief post, even though there are so many interesting things happening this week: the Fannie Mae action against KPMG, the Section 404 revisions for small companies, and Google's online auction plans for employee stock options to name just a few. But ... there's a piece about the conference to write for the subscribers to The Analyst's Accounting Observer.

Anyway - I hung around until the bitter end of the conference hoping to glean a nugget or two about the direction of XBRL. More accurately, I should say I was interested in the velocity of XBRL. The direction is well-known, but it's the speed - and the speed bumps - that we don't know enough about yet.

By 4:30 PM on Day 3 of the conference, I think there were more members of the XBRL panel than there were members of the audience; had to be tough on the panel, but it's not supposed to be easy being an evangelist, I guess. I should mention that the representative from United Technologies, John Stantial, made a really effective case for XBRL usage within a firm. John also urged analysts to "pull on their companies" to use XBRL, instead of having the SEC "push XBRL onto registrants."

Commendable idea, but there's still a nagging lack of readily available (read: free, at least for a trial) front-end software to give analysts and investors something with which to noodle around the XBRL-ified data. Here's a start: the SEC has an experimental reader available for the public to use at this link. Don't get your hopes too high: it's only a start. I spent a few minutes with it; all I'll say for now is that it doesn't reveal the full power of XBRL as claimed by its proponents. But you might want to bookmark the site if only to check back once a month to see if there's a pickup in XBRL's velocity.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.