Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jan 30

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
1/30/2007 7:32 AM 

And they're not the only ones setting the controls of the WABAC machine for the early 1990's.

Sherman and Mr. Peabody, the dog and his boy who went back in time to fix mistakes in history with the aid of the WABAC machine (as in "wayback"), would be busy with backdating right now. If they were around.

In this nonreliance 8-K, game maker Activision took its financial information from 1992 to 2006 out of service. No hints as to the amount of compensation adjustment, nor tax effects, nor specific years that were most affected by improper dating. Just the promise of restated financials ahead. Instead of "back to the future," we're looking "forward to the past."

Also spending time with the WABAC machine: Trident Microsystems. According to this 8-K, they'll be restating from 1994 to 2006, adding an estimated $40 to $50 million of incremental compensation expense. Actual results may vary.

Another trip forward to the past will be taken by Actel. In this nonreliance 8-K, they outline their plans to restate from 1996 to 2006. No clues as to amounts.

This will be a pretty taxing annual report season for some analysts. Not only will there be plenty of current history to digest, there'll be tons of rewritten history to chew on as well.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.