Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
May 23

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
5/23/2006 7:24 AM 

is a strong offense.

While the FASB hasn't yet formally added a lease accounting project to its agenda, it will likely do so by the end of June. Remember, the Board received a prompt from the SEC in its white paper report in June 2005. Some folks take exception to tinkering with lease accounting, and they're mounting an offense before it's added to the FASB agenda.

The Equipment Leasing Association has issued a white paper that "examines the myths that critics assert as supporting evidence that something is wrong with the US lease accounting rules; the analysis also will explode these myths and provide a view of reality."

If you don't want to read the paper, you can pretty much pick up the flavor from the press release entitled "Misguided Criticism of Lease Accounting Standards Exposed by New Equipment Leasing Association White Paper."

I was surprised to find a quote in the paper from me, dating back to last year's corporate spasm of lease restatements; I said in USA Today "the misstatements do not appear to have been intentional and the financial effects only minimal. I think it was just a bad policy.”

I still do. But those remarks are a pretty narrow slice. I also think that lease accounting needs to be revisited. A financial reporting system that lets companies show a return in the income statement from invisible assets and invisible financing is not giving investors the whole, clear picture of the firm's rights and responsibilities.

You can quote me on that.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.