Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Mar 31

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
3/31/2006 7:33 AM 

It's here. The FASB has released its proposal for (finally) making pensions visible in corporate balance sheets. (And in non-profit organizations' balance sheets too.)

You have to give them credit for one thing: when they announced the project last fall, they said they'd get the exposure draft out for this phase in the first quarter of 2006 - and they did, on this very last day of the quarter. In FASB-time, for a project of this size, that's like running four-minute mile.

And if they get this project finished and effective for year end 2006, that would be a virtual FASB windsprint. There's no logical reason it can't happen. The standard will make profound changes on balance sheet geography, moving some unrecognized deferred items out of the footnotes and into different locales on the balance sheet. It won't change the size of benefit plans' expense; it'll just make information already produced by firms visible on the balance sheet.

And it will probably be painful for most firms with benefit plans, of both pension and health care flavors - which will probably raise corporate hackles. So, the only reason that the standard doesn't get issued and become effective at year end is if there's a corporate rope-a-dope strategy: go to Congress, allege market meltdown due to standards overkill, ask for time to study the problem, etc. Keep tuned.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.