Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Mar 31

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
3/31/2006 8:34 AM 

Check out Chairman Chris Cox's speech given yesterday at a Council of Institutional Investors confab in Washington.

Cox draws the comparison between the pay for athletes and entertainers and the pay for executives, and articulates very well the major difference between the way the two compensation sets are derived. The pay level for athletes and entertainers is based based on negotiation and their own popularity. The pay level for executives, however, can be influenced by them: they negotiate with their own board of directors, who are very likely to be executives themselves. They aren't negotiating with the shareholders who actually own the company, but depend on a board to represent their interests. And a good deal of intensity gets lost in that intermediation.

We'll see if the SEC's plans for compensation disclosure improve that bargaining process for shareholders - or just provides more fodder for the compensation consultants.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.