Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Mar 28

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
3/28/2006 8:48 AM 

Then U.S. firms' treasurers are smilin', too. Or something like that.

Glenn R. Simpson reports in today's Wall Street Journal that a new study shows that American companies may been overly aggressive in their use of 12.5% Irish tax rate. The study, conducted by economist Philip Lane of Trinity College Dublin, indicates that U.S. firms may not have in fact had the actual physical investment in Ireland that they should have, in order to take advantage of the lower rate.

As you review the 10-Ks and annual reports, do a little reality checking yourself: if a firm has a low tax rate due to Irish tax rates, take a look at the segment information and see if the firm is predominantly invested/operates in the United States or countries other than Ireland. Might make for some interesting discussions with management if you find a relationship in the segment information that contradicts the information in the tax footnote.

Tried to get the report; as you might expect, Philip Lane's home page was timing out due to overload. Later, I hope.

* * * * * * * * * *


Speaking of the Wall Street Journal (online), anyone else but me notice that if you go to "Industry News" and then select "Accounting Industry", all the news stories that were once feeds from Dow Jones Newswires are gone? This seems to have happened since their revamp of the online Journal, and it doesn't seem to affect the other industries.


Maybe I'm the only subscriber who cares, but I used to find that incredibly helpful.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.