Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jan 27

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
1/27/2006 8:28 AM 

Groundhog Day approaches. I don't mean the actual calendar date, but the excellent 1993 Bill Murray movie about the Pittsburgh weatherman stuck with repeating the same day of his life over and over until he gets it right.


This Groundhog Day isn't nearly as funny or entertaining, I'm afraid. What's being done over and over is the filing of non-reliance 8-Ks with the SEC due to improper use of the shortcut method of testing hedge effectiveness. (Actually, the shortcut method is an alibi for not doing any effectiveness testing of a hedge transaction, so it's a bit of a misnomer.)


Today's company making us feel like we're stuck in Groundhog Day: The Banc Corporation of Birmingham, Alabama. Their 8-K filing denotes one of the prime reasons for a failed shortcut method: they didn't realize that broker's fees related to the CDs that are part of an interest rate swap have a fair value of something at the outset. And to get shortcut treatment, the fair value can only be zero.



Being in a link-happy mood today, here's a link to Michael Rapoport's piece on the subject in today's Wall Street Journal. And a link to Glass, Lewis & Co., whose analyst Jason Williams has prepared an excellent study on the subject and is cited in the article.


Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.