Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Nov 28

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
11/28/2006 7:19 AM 

A couple of years after Fannie Mae's financial reporting breakdown appeared (they still haven't filed 2004 or 2005 financials), at least one milestone is nearly complete: the separation pay package for then-CEO Franklin Raines. He's settling for $2.6 million.

Still up in the air, from this 8-K:

" whether Mr. Raines is entitled to additional unpaid base salary of up to approximately $139,000 for the period from December 2004 to June 2005;

whether Mr. Raines' employment agreement entitles him to awards under our Annual Incentive Plan for 2004 and 2005;

whether Mr. Raines is entitled to specified share amounts under our Performance Share Plan, or PSP, up to a possible maximum of 561,480 shares;

whether Mr. Raines is entitled to any shares for any award cycle under the PSP commencing in 2005; and

whether Mr. Raines' employment agreement entitles him to any additional stock options.

Final resolution of these issues is expected to be deferred until after the results of our accounting restatement are announced."


I'm sure that Fannie Mae shareholders have an answer of their own as to whether or not Mr. Raines is entitled to any of the above rewards. (Not to be printed here.) The settlement serves as a reminder that the restatement is yet to be complete; it's slipped off my radar and I'm sure I'm not the only one. It also makes you wonder if they're coming to a close on at least the 2004 statements.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.