Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Feb 25

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
2/25/2010 1:38 PM 

Finished writing an Accounting Observer report on the FASB's recent amendments of revenue accounting for "multiple deliverable arrangements," and got to actually spend time really reading the paper and other web content instead of just skimming it. If you've had any interest in the intersection of accounting standards and Congress (the location commonly referred to as "hell," I believe), be sure to read Jon Weil's Bloomberg piece on last year's Congressional  hearing that led FASB to issue watered-down financial instrument impairment rules. A year ago, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle was complaining that mark-to-market accounting was forcing them to report losses that weren't "real" - and a year later, they're suing the underwriters that sold them the securities for nearly $4 billion dollars of refunds on the securities, plus interest.

As Weil puts it: "You know the losses are real when the bank is suing to get its money back."

Worth reading - and remembering. Also not to be missed, if you haven't seen it already: Yale finance professor Gary Gorton's Q&A document on what caused the financial crisis, based on testimony to be delivered to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. Eloquent, pointed, understandable - and not a word on fair value reporting.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.

 

 
barbie oyunu barbie giydirme oyunlarI barbie kIz oyunlarI barbie yemek oyunlarI oyunlar oyunlar oyunlar2