Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
May 19

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
5/19/2009 7:15 AM 

Yesterday, the FASB concluded its deliberations on the amendment of Statement 140 (Transfers of Assets) and FIN 46R (Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities). You can see the briefing document here.

The amendment will go into effect at the beginning of fiscal 2010, and it will cover new and existing securitizations and variable interest entities. Heavy securitizers have about half a year to burn down existing securitizations if they are worried they'll show too much newly-displayed - yet always existing - financial leverage.

The fiscal 2010 date doesn't make its application automatic, however. What we've seen in the past: weeks just before a robust standard goes into effect, the affected industry declares that it can't be implemented without more time to change systems, and petitions Congress for help. Or gets the Chamber of Commerce to do the same.

I hope it doesn't play out this way again, but if it doesn't, it might mean that firms have found a way to avoid much reconsolidation of securitizations. Check back in the last quarter and we'll see.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Also sure to make the last quarter interesting: the Supreme Court will hear a challenge to the constitutionality of the Public Company Oversight Board's existence. Stay tuned.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.

 

 
barbie oyunu barbie giydirme oyunlarI barbie kIz oyunlarI barbie yemek oyunlarI oyunlar oyunlar oyunlar2