Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Feb 2

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
2/2/2009 9:09 AM 

The SEC released its "Roadmap" proposal last November, with a deadline for responses of February 19, 2009. It's a meaty proposal: one part deals with allowing companies of a certain size to switch to IFRS reporting from GAAP reporting by the end of 2009, and one part deals with the potential phase-in of IFRS reporting in the United States for public companies if the SEC decides in 2011that it would be a good idea.

As of this writing, there are about thirty comment letters filed with the SEC, and there's a common theme: give us more time!

It's not an unreasonable request. The document is full of weighty considerations that will have effects on issuers for years to come; it's not something to be taken lightly. In the last couple weeks of 2008, the FASB issued a barrage of proposals with short deadlines, sucking away attention that preparers might have spent on the Roadmap proposal. Last but not least, it's year-end closing time for most preparers - and care in preparation of financials will probably never be more greatly needed. (Especially forfirms holding slugs of illiquid securities needing to be valued.)

Many of the companies commenting asked for an extension of the deadline until April 30. Financial Executives International, representing many CFOs and controllers, requested only an additional 45 days, which would be April 5.

If you'd like to see the comment letter of the Investors Technical Advisory Group - one letter that didn't ask for an extension - here's a link to it. A group effort of accounting analysts, the letter lays out some serious concerns with the proposal. Enjoy.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.