Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jun 16

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
6/16/2008 6:39 AM 

Last week, the SEC announced its intention to overhaul the existing disclosures required of oil and gas companies. They've been locked into a disclosure format over 25 years old, one that states reserves on a stringent, consistently-calculated basis. While that "stringent, consistently-calculated basis" provided a good platform for comparisons, it didn't take into account the improvements occurring in oil drilling and gathering technology since the 1970's.
Whatever form the new disclosure takes, it's likely oil and gas companies will show improvements in the amount of their reserves versus the levels they're showing now.

That's kind of ironic: when the disclosures were first mandated, the world was expecting oil reserves to steadily drop. Now, 25 years later, the companies will likely show increases. Hey, technology marches on.

The press release didn't mention timing of the proposed rules or how long investors will have for commenting on them. It will be interesting to see how "principles-based" the rules may be. It's also interesting that the Commission didn't bother to try and get the FASB (or the IASB) to take up this project. They simply issued their Concept Release last year and ran with it. It might have been a good joint project for the two of them - but it would probably never be completed by the end of the current SEC's administration.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.

 

 
barbie oyunu barbie giydirme oyunlarI barbie kIz oyunlarI barbie yemek oyunlarI oyunlar oyunlar oyunlar2