Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jan 9

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
1/9/2008 9:46 AM 

Last November, the SEC voted to eliminate the reconciliation that must be included in a 20-F annual report if a foreign private issuer is presenting its financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as published by the IASB. The official release (No. 33-8879) came to be on December 21, 2007 - with an effective date of March 4, 2008.


That gap - no pun intended - means that affected companies with years ending after November 15, 2007 but wishing to file before March 4, 2008 will still have to comply with the reconciliation as it exists today. So we may still see a few reconciliations, and still get to ponder the wideness of the GAAP in the two sets of standards in terms of recent history. It's possible though, that the SEC will work with those affected companies and possibly grant them exceptions if their differences are minor enough. Too bad investors would never get to see what might be minor differences - and what might not be minor.

In other international news, the FASB sponsored a webcast yesterday. Subject: "Towards a Global Reporting System: Where are We and Where are We Going?" Moderated by Wall Street Journal reporter Senior V-P and Controller of PepsiCo; David Reilly, the panelists included Robert Herz, Chairman of the FASB; Peter Bridgman,Greg Jonas, Managing Director of Moody’s Investors Service, and Sam Ranzilla, Partner at KPMG LLC.

You can access the archived webcast at this FASB link. I haven't listened yet, but from what I've heard, there was general agreement among the group that a fully converged system of accounting could be achieved in about five years, maybe seven. Life comes at you fast, as the commercials say.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.

 

 
barbie oyunu barbie giydirme oyunlarI barbie kIz oyunlarI barbie yemek oyunlarI oyunlar oyunlar oyunlar2