Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Oct 15

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
10/15/2007 7:41 AM 

This Wednesday, the FASB will decide whether or not to delay the implementation date on Statement 157, "Fair Value Measurements." That standard was to go into effect for fiscal years beginning after November 15 - little more than a month away. As noted previously, the Committee on Corporate Repotring of Financial Executives International sent a 12-page letter a couple weeks ago requesting the FASB to delay it.

According to CFO.com, the Institute of Management Accountants has also pushed the FASB to delay the implementation. No trace of their correspondence on the internet, yet, however.

We'll know Wednesday as to whether or not there's a grace period. One chief reason cited for delaying: supporting an "exit price" as required by 157 is too new to handle. That one seems far-fetched: an exit price is one of many possible prices that exist. It's more likely that in a period of price pressure as we're seeing in the markets for some financial instruments, no one really wants the extra trimming that an exit price might provide. A better reason for postponement - though not a new one - is that the IASB is considering the adoption of 157 as a convergence move. Is that really enough of a reason?

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.

 

 
barbie oyunu barbie giydirme oyunlarI barbie kIz oyunlarI barbie yemek oyunlarI oyunlar oyunlar oyunlar2