Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Aug 31

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
8/31/2007 4:00 AM 

An interesting piece by Sarah Johnson in CFO.com: if the SEC’s idea for removing the reconciliation between US GAAP and IFRS-presented financials becomes a reality, then there could be unexpected fallout for companies in the tech sector. The revenue of tech companies following US GAAP might look like it’s growing more slowly than companies following IASB standards.

If two companies have the same identical contract kind of contract, containing elements with different deliverable dates, the one following US GAAP will recognize revenue only as the components are delivered. The one following IFRS would be able to estimate the fair value of the yet-to-be delivered items and recognize the revenue up front. (That’s not too far afield from “gain-on-sale” accounting, which nobody seems to really like - once it stops working, anyway.)

Might be a case of the law of unintended consequences at work: maybe that helps pave the way to success for the SEC’s other international project, which is the concept release proposing that domestic firms get a choice between reporting in US GAAP or IFRS.

At any rate: enjoy the long holiday weekend! See you on Monday

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.

 

 
barbie oyunu barbie giydirme oyunlarI barbie kIz oyunlarI barbie yemek oyunlarI oyunlar oyunlar oyunlar2