Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jul 31

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
7/31/2007 3:12 AM 

Today is the official last day at work for Chester Spatt, the SEC's Chief Economist, as mentioned last week.

His successor was named last Thursday, and he show up for work next Monday. He's Dr. James A. Overdahl, and he hails from a similar post at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The press release describes him as "...a specialist in financial derivatives, [who] is returning to the SEC, where he served as a Senior Financial Economist in the Office of Economic Analysis from 1989 to 1992."

More:

"Dr. Overdahl is the co-author of several leading financial books in multiple editions, including "Financial Derivatives," "Futures, Options, and Swaps," and "Understanding Futures Markets." He has written extensively on derivatives, trading practices, options, stock exchange regulation, and enforcement related issues, including in the Journal of Law and Economics, The Business Lawyer, the Journal of Derivatives, and the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis."

Judging by his skill set, it sounds like the SEC is expecting this area to be a hotbed over the next few years.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.