Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jul 26

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
7/26/2007 3:47 AM 

The SEC announced yesterday that it intends to seek comments from US investors on allowing US companies to report in either US GAAP or IFRS accounting standards. There'll be a 90 day comment period once the proposal is released in the Federal Register. (It's not out yet; I'll link when it's available.)

This is on the heels of the Commission's proposal to eliminate the reconciliation between the IFRS reporting and GAAP in filings of foreign registrants. Funny - if you look at the "convergence roadmap" laid out by former chief accountant Don Nicolaisen, the staff was expected to decide "whether and when it is in a position to recommend to the Commission that it eliminate the IFRSs to US GAAP reconciliation requirement" in "2009, or possibly sooner." Sooner it is, it seems. All those reviews of IFRS-to-GAAP reconciliations that were to take place in 2006 and 2007 must have revealed that everything is working just fine in IFRS-land...

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.