Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jul 26

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
7/26/2007 3:30 AM 

The discovery period of the backdating drama is largely behind us - it seems like all the special committees that were formed last year to examine suspicious awards have finished their work and cleansed corporate consciences.

Now we're in the prosecution phase, where most of the activity is going to be initiated by the SEC. The agency's machinery has been clicking along a bit faster lately, and yesterday the Commission announced that it was filing backdating-related charges against semiconductor company KLA-Tencor and its former CEO Kenneth Schroeder.

The routine backdating schemes overstated KLA-Tencor's net income in fiscal years 1998 through 2005 by as much as 156 percent.

The company settled with the SEC by "consenting to a permanent injunction against violations of the reporting, books and records, and internal controls provisions of federal securities laws;" it wasn't charged with fraud, and no monetary penalty was sought by the Commission because of the company's cooperation in the Commission's investigation and its extensive remedial measures. Kudos to the firm for staving off SEC action that would have caused the current shareholders to suffer any monetary damages.

The former CEO on the other hand, has still got the worst ahead of him. The Commission charges that "he repeatedly engaged in backdating after becoming CEO in 1999, including pricing large awards of options to himself that were "in the money" by millions of dollars - a potential windfall never disclosed to KLA-Tencor's shareholders. According to the complaint, Schroeder received a legal memorandum in March 2001 cautioning that "the Board and its committees are limited in their ability to grant options at a retroactive price without exposing the company to risk of an accounting charge." The memo further warned that "[a]ny attempt to set a price before such a grant is made raises substantial risks under securities and tax laws [and] accounting rules and gives rise to disclosure obligations." The Commission alleges that Schroeder nonetheless continued to backdate options."

Sounds like backdating options is just like eating salted peanuts - who can eat just one?

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.