Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jul 23

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
7/23/2007 3:06 AM 

I mentioned it as an aside about a month ago: the SEC built a web-based tool to let investors find the companies that do business with countries that the State Department has designated as sponsors of terrorism.

It didn't strike me as the kind of thing all investors would want: there as many varieties of investors as there are companies. It seemed like an admirable tweak of the EDGAR system however, a subtle one that would increase value to many investors without a lot of effort. There are some investors that do not want their portfolios to provide any possible financing to sponsors of terrorism (the State of Florida's pension system, for one example). This was a good "first cut" kind of tool for many of them. And there are many "little guys" who would like to do the same.

So, it didn't seem like it was something destined to raise much dust when it first arrived. Then last week, Barney Frank, chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services, criticized the tool as being inaccurate.

On Friday, the SEC took the tool away from investors. According to a statement by Chairman Christopher Cox, it will return with more up-to-date information. That carries the implication that the tool will corral information from 10-Qs as well as 10-Ks. (The original tool extracted data from only 10-Ks.) Cox also hinted that the tool might evolve into an XBRL project - and that "the Commission staff will also consider whether to recommend a Concept Release on the question of how best to make public company disclosure of activities in terrorist states more accessible. The release would solicit public comment in a formal way, so that the Commission could ensure that all legitimate concerns can be met while providing better access to company disclosures on these topics." If that happens, it will be quite a while before tool reappears - and it'll be interesting to follow the dialogue on the concept release. Those firms who try to stonewall it will be visible in the process, and their motives for slowing down the development of the tool would be justifiably questionable.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.