Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jun 28

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
6/28/2007 1:15 AM 

Yesterday, SEC chairman Christopher Cox held a press conference to announce the formation of an advisory committee whose mission is to 1) study complexity in financial reporting and 2) make financial reporting more understandable to investors. (Press release link here; webcast link here.)

The committee will be chaired by Robert Pozen, Chairman of MFS Investments, and formerly vice chairman of Fidelity Investments. Over the next few weeks, 13 to 17 more members will be added. The committee is expected to take a year to develop its recommendations.

According to the press release, the areas to be studied:

  • the current approach to setting financial accounting and reporting standards;
  • the current process of regulating compliance by registrants and financial professionals with accounting and reporting standards;
  • the current systems for delivering financial information to investors and accessing that information;
  • other environmental factors that drive unnecessary complexity and reduce transparency to investors;
  • whether there are current accounting and reporting standards that impose costs that outweigh the resulting benefits, and
  • whether this cost-benefit analysis is likely to be impacted by the growing use of international accounting standards.

    Though not mentioned in the press release (and I don't remember it in the webcast), the effort seems to be a parallel to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's plans for streamlining capital markets regulation.

    One wonders: is this an attempt to speed up the adoption of international accounting standards in the United States? Will the committee recommend swapping out parts of US standards with IFRS comparables? Will anyone care? (Just kidding.) One would hope though, that when they study "other environmental factors that drive unnecessary complexity and reduce transparency to investors," they take a good hard look at the tort system and the reasons why auditors and accountants always request ever more-detailed guidance from standard-setters. That builds up complexity quickly. The cost-benefit analysis angle should be interesting also; that's a new-found mantra in criticisms of the FASB and SEC. You can hear an echo of it in the comments of Columbia Business School's Glenn Hubbard in this Wall Street Journal video. More to come as the committee strikes up a beat.

    Tags:
  •  

    Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


        Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

        Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

    A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

    For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.