Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jul 26

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
7/26/2005 5:57 AM 

Good article this morning in the LA Times on SEC Chairman nominee Christopher Cox - pretty neutral, really, more or less a biography piece.

Cox's confirmation hearing is today, so we'll be hearing plenty more about his history - and projections about his future actions - once he's confirmed as chairman. As noted before in this space, he will be the most aggressively observed - and lobbied - chairman in SEC history. You've got special interest types like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce already calling for him to roll back regulations - especially any having to do with stock options. There are his California bonds with folks like David Dreier. And because of his ties to Silicon Valley through the law firm of Latham & Watkins, and his three-time record in proposing or sponsoring FASB-blocking legislation, he's also the subject of much trepidation, like this. Can't really blame Professor Ketz for feeling that way, either.

What are we going to get? I have no better idea than anyone else. I don't care for the man's legislative record one whit, but I have to admire his intellect and guts. I believe that when persons are put in the role that he's going to occupy, they can surprise onlookers with their fairness and their ability to put their past aside. And that's what I'm hoping for. He's innocent until proven guilty - and he's going to have plenty of chances to prove innocence or guilt.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.