Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jul 20

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
7/20/2005 7:33 AM 

Just when you thought it was safe to lease again. Or account for leases, at least.

Continental Airlines filed an amended first quarter '05 10-Q and 2004 10-K because of incorrect operating lease accounting. This is the first airline I recall having lease accounting issues this year.

The problems centered on accounting for rent escalations and depreciation on leasehold improvements at airports and other facilities. The total lease expense adjustment for the proper accounting of rent escalations is $81 million, from 1993 through 2004; amounts range from $3 million to $12 million per year. The total depreciation expense adjustment is $30 million, for years between 1993 to 2004; adjustment amount run between $1 million to $6 million per year.

The correction added $2 million more of rent expense and depreciation to the 1Q05 net loss; no change in income taxes. For 1Q04, the restatement added $2 million more of additional rent expense and depreciation and a $29 million reduction of income tax benefit.

Don't hyperventilate yet, but there could be more of them. Once one player in an industry has uncovered an error like this, there's a burden on the others in the group - and their auditors - to consider the possibility that there could be a similar issue in their own house. The next couple weeks will be telling.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.