Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jul 21

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
7/21/2005 5:26 AM 

It looks like Deloitte-the-global-firm isn't the only one of the Big 4 having trouble with wayward local affiliates. (Think Parmalat.)

This episode never turned up on my radar screen. KPMG International had a scrape with its Norwegian affiliate a few years ago. The affiliate had been responsible for auditing an outfit known as Finance Credit, which dealt in collecting distressed debt. Apparently, its principals hid the firm's own distress from the KPMG affiliate; in 2003, the firm eventually turned into "one of Norway's worst bankruptcies." It owed about $200 million. (Maybe that's why it didn't get a lot of attention here. Our then-current worst bankruptcies were a bit more dramatic.)

An Oslo district court has found that the Norwegian branch of KPMG is liable for the non-discovery of the fraud and ordered them to pay about $100 million.

Both episodes serve to illustrate an inherent contradiction in these global auditing business: they need to be global, but try to contain their own liability at the local level. From the sound of the article, KPMG was more successful than Deloitte has been in walling off its liability.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.