Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jun 30

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
6/30/2005 6:08 AM 

The Cisco proposition for valuing employee stock options has been mentioned a number of times in this space. (If you don't believe me, and you're the masochistic type, just type "Cisco" into the search box at right.) The story has gone pretty cold lately; we don't know if the SEC is going to buy off on it or reject it out of hand. And the reason is that there's an awful lot of evaluation of that proposition going on that is not seeing the light of day.

The Council of Institutional Investors, a voice for institutional shareholders, picked up its pen and outlined its concerns about that lack of sunshine in a letter to Don Nicolaisen, chief accountant of the SEC.


The CII letter mentions the issues that came to its attention from press reports, and requested "that the Commission, should it consider any formal or informal action, provide full transparency on this proposal and open a public comment period of at least 90 days to solicit the views of investors and other interested parties."

The Council's got its due process right - any consideration of this proposition deserves to be disinfected publicly. The real question, though: does this proposition, lobbed in the final seconds of the game as an obvious tactic to delay stock option expense treatment, deserve any serious consideration?

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.