Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jun 28

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
6/28/2005 7:20 AM 

HealthSouth filed its amended 10-K for 2002 and 2003 yesterday. It was something of a two-for-one special: in addition to the restated 2002 and 2003 financials, it also contained a restatement of 2001 and 2000 financials. Still to come: 2004, and eventually, year to date information for 2005.

Some highlights:

- Cumulative net reduction to shareholders' equity of $3.9 billion as of December 31, 2001;

- Reduction in previously reported net income of $393.6 million for 2001 and $642.7 million for 2000.

- Writedowns of net goodwill and other intangible assets from $2.7 billion to $1.4 billion at December 31, 2001.

- Writedowns of property and equipment from $2.8 billion to $1.8 billion at December 31, 2001.

Those adjustments wiped out stockholders' equity; at the end of 2003, the stake of shareholders in HealthSouth was a negative $964 million.

By comparison, AIG restated earnings from 2000 through 2003 and knocked equity down by $2.26 billion at the end of 2004; it reduced 2004 earnings $1.32 billion, or 11.9%, from the previously announced $11.05 billion.

Neither company's announcements had much of an effect on their company's stock price - at least so far, in the case of HealthSouth. You could argue that the information in contained in the restatements was pretty much worked into the stock price for a long time. Or you could say that the investing world is becoming pretty much numb to multi-billion restatements.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.