Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
May 19

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
5/19/2005 5:55 AM 

A lot more than most of us, I think it's fair to say. (And I'd be happy to admit it, too.)

Remember the Cisco system for divining dubious values on employee stock options? The one they've put on the SEC's plate for vetting? Then read this article from Dow Jones Newswires by way of CNNMoney: "Stock-Option Guru Scholes Doubtful On Cisco Value Plan."

Mr. Scholes' comments are straight out of Econ 101, (see: supply & demand). "In order to bring "a very idiosyncratic contract to the market," he said, it would have to be sold at a discount "in order to encourage the market to take it."

While Cisco is billing the alternative market price as an attempt to find an "accurate" valuation for stock-option expensing, Scholes said the market auction proposal is one that by its nature will not draw a true price. For one thing, a small market placement and little liquidity means the issue would likely sell at a discount...the outsider with less information [than Cisco] would pay less for such an instrument than the cost to Cisco."
[Emphasis added.]

Sounds sensible. Mr. Scholes makes some sound points about the robustness of the market for these instruments; I would have liked to know what he thought about the "option on an option aspect" of the instruments as well, but the interview or the article didn't go there. We'll have to wait and see if the SEC reaches the same conclusions as he does.



Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.