Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Apr 7

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
4/7/2005 8:00 AM 

With the financial press now fixated on AIG and MBIA (there's a trading rule for you: don't go long on financial institutions whose names are acronyms), the Fannie Mae investigation doesn't have the same grip on investors as it did a few months ago. Yet the news from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) continues to stream forth, and it sounds like the investigation is winding down.

Yesterday, Armando Falcon, OFHEO director Armando Falcon delivered a statement before the Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises outlining current developments in the Fannie Mae special examination - and delivering the punch line that he would retire from his post on May 20, "barring extraordinary circumstances." His appointment expired last October, but he stayed on to stick with the investigation, which now appears to be drawing to a close.

Falcon's statement included descriptions of the recent findings, but no figures. A few highlights:

Statement 65: Acquired mortgage loans are to be classified as held-for-investment (HFI) or held-for-sale (HFS). Fannie policy was to designate the classification at acquisition of th loans, depending on the intent. So far, so good; where it went sour was in the data processing system. For the last 21 years, it incorrectly classified all acquired mortgage loans as HFI, regardless of the initial classification. The accounting for HFI and HFS securities differs after acqusition, so there's 21 years of accumulated fixing-up to do.

Statement 115: Another classification issue. Statement 115 requires different treatment for securities held-to-maturity (amortized cost), available-for-sale (fair value, changes through other comprehensive income), and trading (fair value, changes through earnings). Figuring which balance sheet bucket into which a freshly-acquired security is dropped should happen when the security is bought. Fannie Mae essentially would give itself a month to make that decision, giving itself the gift of 20/20 hindsight - and the ability to better "cherry-pick" its portfolio by making transfers from one bucket to another. The usual consequences of such malfeasance: the offending company loses the right to classify securities as held-to-maturity, something Falcon hinted might occur.

Other misapplied accounting related to securitizations, derivatives and consolidation of variable interest entities. Once the numbers are spelled out on all of the accounting recasts, it'll be very interesting to see what the real Fannie Mae capital ratios look like compared to what they were. One note on the Statement 115 hitch: it's more evidence that the thirteen-year old standard needs to be overhauled or gutted. Three distinct classifications for investment securities with three different earnings effects leaves plenty of opportunity for earnings management - and Fannie provides first-class evidence that it happens.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.

 

 
barbie oyunu barbie giydirme oyunlarI barbie kIz oyunlarI barbie yemek oyunlarI oyunlar oyunlar oyunlar2