Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Mar 28

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
3/28/2005 1:00 PM 

The Wall Street Journal ran a story this morning that's sure to make an impression on anyone curious about high fast audit fees will rise in the wake of Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance. A study of 23 firms in the Dow Jones Industrials - some of the largest companies trading in the stock markets - showed that their audit fees rose about 40% to $533 million. That's sure to make an impression.

But that's on 23 of the largest firms - not exactly the stuff to draw conclusions from about the greater population. So - I wandered into the R.G. Associates data warehouse, poking around for some stuff I knew we had on audit fees. I found an audit fee file we'd started that contained 103 companies not in the Dow Jones Industrials - maybe a fairer sample from which to draw inferences. (Note: it's preliminary data, and not likely to be updated here in the weblog. It's part of a larger project to be made available at a later date to subscribers of The Analyst's Accounting Observer.)

It's a bit mixy to just look at the audit fees alone - there's no clear definition of what firms parse out of it and put into "audit-related" fees. Some firms include quarterly reviews in audit fees, for instance, and some include them in audit-related fees. So, to be on the safe side, we combined them for 2004 and 2003 to get an idea of how much fees have changed in one year.

The change in total audit fees for the 103 non-DJIA companies? 23.3%. (If you looked at the straight audit fee figure alone, it wasn't much different: 24.4%.) A pretty far cry from 40% - but even if it was 40% for all the firms, it would still make sense. If auditing firms have skinnied down their fees for years, making up for it with consulting fees later, and they're now compelled to do more nitty-gritty auditing work - how can you expect them to do it for free? A prickly, viable auditing profession is necessary for the well-being of investors and capital markets, and paying them well for services is one way to ensure their ability to recruit future auditors.

Table below; dollars in millions. Forgive the appearance, but this HTML stuff is taking time to get.





























































































































td>


2004 Audit Fees

2004 Audit-related Fees


Total

% Chg.

2003 Total

Air Products & Chemicals


$3.80

$0.50

$4.30

2.4%

4.20


Alberto-Culver

1.97

0.08

2.06

4.9%

1.96

Apollo Group

0.48

0.06

0.54

45.2%


0.37

Amerisourcebergen

2.11

0.29

2.40


-12.9%

2.76

Applied Materials

2.55

0.13


2.68

94.8%

1.38

Analog Devices

1.53


0.21

1.74

6.8%

1.63

Archer-Daniels-Midland


7.31

0.20

7.51

48.3%

5.07


Agilent Technologies

4.59

0.17

4.76

6.7%

4.46

Andrew

1.78

0.12

1.90

5.9%


1.79

Automatic Data Processing

4.61

3.56

8.17


33.3%

6.13

Autozone

0.62

0.01


0.63

12.5%

0.56

Applera

1.92


0.30

2.22

5.5%

2.10

Becton Dickinson


3.93

0.10

4.03

17.7%

3.42


Best Buy

1.01

0.17

1.18

58.1%

0.75

Biomet

1.19

0.08

1.27

1.6%


1.25

Applied Micro Circuits

0.22

0.10

0.33


-4.7%

0.35

Bmc Software

3.65

0.04


3.68

44.8%

2.54

Brown-Forman

0.99


0.62

1.61

39.2%

1.16

Campbell Soup


2.39

0.12

2.51

26.3%

1.98


Cardinal Health

8.02

2.93

10.94

56.5%

6.99

Ashland

5.32

0.15

5.47

8.0%


5.06

Autodesk

1.65

0.00

1.65


16.0%

1.43

Ciena

0.62

0.14


0.76

5.7%

0.72

Cintas

0.29


0.11

0.40

-32.4%

0.60

Circuit City Stores


0.64

0.40

1.04

14.0%

0.92


Cisco Systems

3.90

6.40

10.30

191.5%

3.54

Clorox

2.36

0.28

2.64

-7.7%


2.86

Coach

0.62

0.24

0.86


47.5%

0.58

Avaya

3.70

5.00


8.70

85.4%

4.69

Computer Sciences

4.69


1.39

6.08

13.3%

5.37

Compuware


1.11

0.04

1.15

40.8%

0.82


Conagra Foods

4.08

1.36

5.44

-4.4%

5.69

Costco Wholesale

1.11

0.40

1.50

63.6%


0.92

Darden Restaurants

0.40

0.04

0.44


-13.9%

0.51

Deere

7.20

1.00


8.20

18.8%

6.90

Dell

3.90


1.20

5.10

15.9%

4.40

Affiliated Comp Svcs.


0.86

0.61

1.47

66.2%

0.88


Block, H & R

2.12

0.94

3.07

71.4%


1.79

Emerson Electric

11.10

2.50

13.60


5.4%

12.90

Family Dollar Stores

0.19

0.04


0.23

13.0%

0.20

FedEx

7.33


0.37

7.70

21.9%

6.32

Forest Laboratories


0.65

0.02

0.67

1.1%

0.66


Franklin Resources

1.80

0.70

2.50

25.0%

2.00

General Mills

3.25

0.54

3.79

29.6%


2.93

Goldman Sachs

32.10

1.90

34.00


52.5%

22.30

Health Management Assoc.

1.12

0.05


1.17

11.3%

1.05

Heinz

4.34


0.58

4.92

-27.7%

6.81

ADC Telecommunications


1.85

0.55

2.40

92.0%

1.25


Centex

2.54

0.22

2.76

54.9%

1.78

Intuit

1.30

0.00

1.30

31.0%


0.99

Jabil Circuit

2.20

0.11

2.30


14.8%

2.00

JDS Uniphase

3.50

0.19


3.68

24.1%

2.97

Johnson Controls

7.99


2.24

10.23

4.4%

9.80

KB Home


1.76

0.14

1.90

68.4%

1.13


KLA-Tencor

1.19

0.11

1.30

30.5%

1.00

Linear Technology

0.26

0.01

0.27

12.5%


0.24

Lucent Technologies

7.65

1.76

9.42


-3.9%

9.80

Maxim Integrated Products

0.55

0.00


0.55

11.0%

0.50

McCormick & Co


3.70

0.40

4.10

7.9%

3.80


McKesson

4.15

1.35

5.49

9.1%

5.04

Medtronic

3.05

0.38

3.43

4.4%


3.28

Meredith

0.44

0.07

0.51


9.9%

0.46

Micron Technology

1.40

0.00


1.40

0.0%

1.40

Computer Associates

6.79


0.12

6.91

61.4%

4.28

Molex


1.12

0.15

1.28

6.9%

1.19


Monsanto

4.00

0.40

4.40

29.4%

3.40

Morgan Stanley

31.60

6.70

38.30

47.9%


25.90

Mylan Laboratories

0.44

0.08

0.52


-8.2%

0.57

National Semiconductor

2.17

0.04


2.21

31.2%

1.68

Navistar International

3.34


0.22

3.56

29.1%

2.76

Network Appliance


0.91

0.34

1.26

38.7%

0.90


Nike

3.10

0.20

3.30

17.9%

2.80

Nordstrom

1.08

0.17

1.25

-0.8%


1.26

Novell

2.86

0.19

3.05


25.3%

2.44

Nvidia

0.89

0.02


0.91

-9.4%

1.00

Oracle

4.91


0.27

5.18

30.9%

3.95

Pall


2.35

0.11

2.47

13.3%

2.18


Parametric Technology

1.67

0.10

1.77

8.7%

1.63

Parker-Hannifin

4.23

0.70

4.93

60.6%


3.07

Paychex

0.33

0.19

0.52


2.0%

0.51

Peoples Energy

0.62

0.01


0.64

-13.7%

0.74

Electronic Arts

2.13


0.02

2.15

26.3%

1.70

Qlogic


0.25

0.00

0.25

11.7%

0.22


Qualcomm

4.26

1.48

5.74

76.3%

3.26

Rockwell Automation

2.70

2.30

5.00

8.7%


4.60

Rockwell Collins

2.09

0.44

2.53


26.6%

2.00

Sanmina-SCI

3.93

0.00


3.93

-36.6%

6.20

Sara Lee

9.50


4.20

13.70

38.4%

9.90

Scientific-Atlanta


1.90

0.05

1.96

29.8%

1.51


Solectron

6.80

5.52

12.32

124.0%

5.50

Starbucks

1.58

0.03

1.61

9.2%


1.47

Sun Microsystems

5.38

0.04

5.42


43.7%

3.78

Supervalu

1.00

0.38


1.37

-14.0%

1.60

Symantec

1.87


0.04

1.91

82.5%

1.05

Sysco


2.31

0.42

2.73

28.2%

2.13


Target

1.70

0.20

1.90

18.8%

1.60

Tektronix

1.41

0.23

1.64

3.7%


1.58

Tiffany & Co

1.02

0.25


1.27

15.0%

1.11

TJX Companies

2.16


0.71

2.86

73.1%

1.66

Tyco International Ltd


31.00

3.50

34.50

-16.3%

41.20


Walgreen

0.60

0.08

0.68

16.8%

0.58

Intl Game Technology

1.10

0.40

1.50

-11.8%


1.70

Xilinx

0.81

0.10

0.91


55.2%

0.59

$362.56

$74.14

$436.70


23.3%

$354.31

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.