Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Mar 14

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
3/14/2005 8:33 AM 

This morning, Countrywide Credit Industries filed an amendment of their earlier revocation of 2004 financial statements. As you may recall from these pages, that restatement hinged on a premature recognition of gains on sales of loans and securities during 2004 quarters.

Not the end of the story. The company has gone further back into the securitization archives, and found that it must restate the June and September quarters of 2003 as well. The June quarter will see a shift of $185.7 million of pretax income into the September quarter and a decrease of $.20 in June 2003 earnings per share and a similar increase in September 2003's earnings per share. Because the erroneous sale involved loans and securities, the restated June balance sheet will have an increase in mortgage loans held for sale and notes payable of $2.9 billion.

The timing is curious, in that Countrywide should have probably suspected that other periods may have been misstated when they originally announced their problem. Perhaps they didn't want to sit on some solid information that they could share with shareholders while waiting to clear up questions about the older securitizations. Whatever the reasons, serial disclosure of problems is not a practice that enhances trust and credibility.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.

 

 
barbie oyunu barbie giydirme oyunlarI barbie kIz oyunlarI barbie yemek oyunlarI oyunlar oyunlar oyunlar2