Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Feb 25

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
2/25/2005 9:33 AM 

I've weblogged a lot about this topic in the last few weeks. This would be a good time to pull together some of the data and some (perhaps) deeper thoughts and prognostications.

Data first. Here's a list of 37 companies to date who have announced that they have lease accounting dysfunction. Not all of them are restating past financials; some like Target, are simply catching up the errors in the current quarter because they aren't very signficant. I make no claims that this list is all-inclusive. (Yes, I know a table would be much more readable. Unfortunately, I have not advanced my knowledge of WordPress blogging software to the point where I can do this.)

Abercromie & Fitch
Benihana
Big Lots
Borders Group
Brinker International
Buca
CEC Entertainment
Champps Entertainment
Cingular Wireless
CKE Restaurants
Cracker Barrel
Crown Castle International
Darden Restaurants
Dollar General
Emeritus
Fresh Choice
Gymboree
J. Jill Group
Jack in the Box
Kohl's
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts
Lone Star Steakhouse
Lowes
McDonalds
Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack
Powell Industries
Rubios Restaurants
Ruby Tuesday
Sears
Siebel Systems
Starbucks
Target
Total Entertainment Restaurant
Toys 'R Us
Tullys Coffee
Ubiquitel
West Marine


That's it for the data; thirty-seven companies doesn't sound like many, but it feels like it's been in the hundreds because of the Chinese water torture aspect of their arrival. One or two drips a day makes it feel like they've been in the news forever.

I suspect that the Chinese water torture may come to an end - and in its place, a dousing with a fire hose. Why? Several reasons. As I mentioned in the prior posting on Cingular, we're starting to see remedies for dysfunctional lease accounting emerge in an industry other than the restaurant and retail industries. (Don't forget Siebel Systems, another non-R&R lease restater.) The accounting principles governing leases don't apply to just real estate so it's entirely possible that more dysfunctional lease accounting could be uncovered elsewhere. Firms and auditors don't work in a vacuum. Once an issue has been uncovered, they'd be foolish not to check for exposure in their own house. (Or in their audit client's house.) This has certainly become a known issue.

I believe that accounting precision has been ratcheted upwards as firms go through their Section 404 reviews, and this may be what got the ball rolling on these issues in the first place. I can't see any reason for accounting precision to reverse.

There's another reason we could be awash in more lease accounting revelations. Don Nicolaisen's lease accounting letter was issued on February 7 - after some firms had already reported their most recent quarter. I think there could be quite a few retailers/restauranteurs alone that issued earnings before the SEC letter was issued, and after the initial lease restatement announcements in late November. They may be waiting until their first quarter earnings to complete their determinations of lease accounting compliance.

Where did it all begin? Impossible to know. The error amounts have certainly not been extreme, but they're enough to make you wonder if they weren't part of the "get every penny of EPS" mentality that we've observed over the years. Like I said earlier: firms don't work in a vacuum. If one company adopted any of the improper lease techniques, you can be sure that its competitors would adopt it so as not to lose ground in comparison.

So, I think we can expect more lease accounting foolishness to be revealed. Take it with a grain of salt - rather than smoking gun evidence of financial chicanery, consider them to be a classic example of lowest common denominator accounting, the kind that happens when you try to be too much in touch with the rest of your competitors. It's like the kid who cheated in grade school by copying the test answers from his neighbor - and copied the answers his neighbor had wrong.

And as auditors sharpen their focus by learning more in their ongoing Section 404 reviews, I wouldn't be surprised to see more restatement waves for other accounting principles gone sloppy.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.