Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Oct 28

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
10/28/2005 5:48 AM 

Spent yesterday in New York; I had the chance to speak at the New York Society of Security Analysts' 12th Annual Financial Reporting Conference.

A good show for this kind of stuff, a really impressive cast of speakers, (pro forma-ing out myself there) and a surprisingly good crowd, given that it's earnings season. Always look for the backstory: it was less surprising when you realized that a lot of the audience was from the press. Still, it was good to meet up with some folks I've talked to for years and never met in person. (If you're reading this, you know who you are.)

A cold day in New York in the fall? Accounting? You call this work?

So, today's posting will be thin gruel indeed. There are two (long) Observer pieces that are begging for me to start, and I'm running in minimum-sleep mode. I'll be posting the talk I gave as part of a duo with Howard Schilit. Howard's done more than anybody I know to raise analyst awareness about accounting issues; our views on the question "has financial reporting improved?" weren't exactly symmetrical, but not exactly opposite either. Anyway, I'll put the script up next week on the Accounting Observer website. (Can't get it to the webmaster right now because I don't have the file with me.)

In the meantime, here's a link to my comments on FASB's business combinations exposure draft. Like I said, thin gruel. See you next week.


Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.