Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Oct 26

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
10/26/2005 7:53 PM 

One of my favorite parts of the day's end: getting Fortune magazine's Street Life in the e-mail. It's a daily wrap-up of market events, authored by a rotating cast of some of Fortune's most entertaining writers. And it lets me know what I missed during the day - like today. Says Andy Serwer in today's column:

"SAN JUAN SINKHOLE: Have you been following this Puerto Rican bank scandal? Me neither. Until now. Turns out the three biggest financial institutions there are under fire for bad accounting. Doral Financial, the island's biggest mortgage lender, just revealed that the SEC has begun a formal investigation. Stock is down to $8.80; it was close to $50 earlier this year. First BanCorp and R&G have also announced problems. Watch this space for takeovers! Hello? Chris Flowers speaking...."

Nope, not exactly following it: but back in April it was noted in this space that Doral Financial was making some pretty serious adjustments to its interest-only residuals resulting from securitizations of loans. And in July, it was noted that R&G Financial (absolutely, positively no relation to R.G. Associates, which is - me) was also having trouble making its accounting work when it comes to securitizations. As for First BanCorp, that one went by me. It is rather curious: three big players in a small area all coming down with the accounting flu.

Let's follow it now, at least for a little bit. First, a look at the First Bancorp announcement of the SEC investigation released last Friday:

One issue under review by the Audit Committee is whether the mortgage transactions at issue were properly classified for accounting purposes as purchases of the mortgage loans by First Bank or whether they should have been treated as loans by First Bank to the other financial institutions, secured by the mortgages. Although the Company's accounting analysis is not complete, First Bank has concluded that most of its transactions with one financial institution, R&G Mortgage Corp, did not qualify as true sales as a legal matter. Accordingly, these transactions may need to be accounted for as a secured loan to that financial institution. As a result, First BanCorp may be required to restate its previously issued financial statements for the period from 2000 through the first quarter of 2005.

Any reclassification of the transactions as secured loans rather than as purchases of mortgages would affect the notes to the Company's financial statements as well as the Company's presentation of its cash flow from investing activities. The Company is reviewing the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses relating to the potential reclassified secured loans as well as the regulatory capital implications of the reclassifications. Any need to change the allowance for loan losses would impact previously reported net income and loans net of allowance for loan losses.


Interesting: looks like R&G Financial and First Bancorp may have gotten the flu from each other. R&G Financial, in yesterday's disclosure about the SEC investigation, was much less forthcoming - and made no mention of First Bancorp or any other institutions. As for Doral, its release today was for the purpose of notifying investors that "it no longer expects to file by November 10, its amended annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The delay is principally attributable to new information regarding the Company's mortgage loan sales to local financial institutions."

Note the plural: institutions. It'll be interesting to see if there other players yet to be named involved in this - and especially interesting if any others are non-publicly traded players.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.