Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Oct 21

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
10/21/2005 7:06 AM 

Yesterday I mentioned Unisys' heads-up to investors about a possible revaluation of its deferred tax assets (DTAs) - an accounting move that carries some implications about a management's expectations about future profitability.

Almost as if to illustrate what I was talking about , Eastman Kodak upped its valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets on the very same day Unisys warned about theirs. That resulted in a third quarter $900 million charge for the battered film and camera maker; it's essentially a management confirmation of what's widely expected about the firm's domestic outlook.

You shouldn't expect pinpointed revelations from keeping tabs on these announcements and writedowns - but they're important for forming a context or backdrop against which you can compare other management assertions. If a management is giving an optimistic outlook for 2006 and beyond, while cutting back on the value of its deferred tax assets because of implicit concerns about their realizability, that's a contradiction that needs to be explored.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.