Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Feb 9

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
2/9/2005 2:04 PM 

On February 7, SEC chief accountant Don Nicolaisen sent a letter to the AICPA's chairman of its "Center for Public Company Audit Firms" outlining the staff's thoughts on the accounting issues involved in the recent rash of leasing do-overs. The letter was cc'd to the chief accountant of the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance, the chairman of the FASB, and the AICPA's SEC Regulations Committee. (I'm a member of that one.)

Nicolaisen reminded readers of the proper accounting for three particular lease issues:

1. The mismatch issue: Don't depreciate leasehold improvements over a longer period than the contract term for the leased property. (See Target and others.)

2. The "rent holiday" issue: If a rental agreement contains scheduled increases (sometimes called a "rent holiday": you can tailor the scheduled payments to match the lessee's cash flow, making for a near-term holiday for the cash-strapped), work the escalations into the total minimum rentals, to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term as part of the rental expense.

3. The lessor leasehold improvement incentive issue: If a lessor picks up the tab for leasehold improvements the lessee will use, as bait to sign the lease, the lessee should account for the expenditure as deferred rental revenues - not by netting it against the cost of leasehold improvements. The deferred rental revenues should be amortized against rental expense over the lease period.

The first two issues have been well covered by now. The third one - the incentive issue - surfaced this morning with Borders Group. Maybe they read Nicolaisen's letter on Monday. Or maybe Nicolaisen wrote the letter after the SEC staff worked with Borders and their auditors. Doesn't matter, really.

Letters like these aren't exactly dictations of new accounting standards - indeed, there's nothing new in this letter. It's a cross-reference to existing standards. Letters like these, however, do find their way into the think tanks of auditing firms - hence the distribution to the AICPA's Center for Public Company Auditors and its SEC Regs Committee. Theoretically, they'll become part of the audit planning/follow-up throughout all auditing firm's clients.

Yes, it's a rickety, might-miss system, but it still will be likely to generate a lot more of these lease accounting do-overs. Keep tuned.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.

 

 
barbie oyunu barbie giydirme oyunlarI barbie kIz oyunlarI barbie yemek oyunlarI oyunlar oyunlar oyunlar2