Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jan 31

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
1/31/2005 9:04 AM 

Last week, Eastman Kodak was in the news: it was the first major company to disclose that it expects an adverse opinion from its auditor (PricewaterhouseCoopers) on its internal controls. This morning, Visteon joined ranks with it - right down to the same auditor.

Visteon released an 8-K detailing its expected restatement of 2002, 2003, and the first three quarters of 2004. The restatement is due to a potpourri of changes: a switch in inventory accounting from LIFO to FIFO; an adjustment to deferred taxes for the effects of currency fluctuations on retained earnings of foreign subsidiaries, triggered by plans to repatriate earnings; deferred tax valuation allowance adjustments; and a reversal of reductions in postretirement life and health care costs.

It's that last one that's the most interesting. It seems that Visteon had modified the terms of its OPEB plans in the US and the changes in benefits had not been properly communicated to the employees under Statement 106 - and that means they couldn't go ahead and account for the reductions in benefit expense that they took in 2002, 2003 and the first nine months of 2004. The restatement will reverse those $88 million of cumulative pre-tax cost decrements. (There's a deferred tax effect to the reversal as well, perhaps as much as $54 million. It's not completely clear from the 8-K if some of that amount relates to the inventory methodology switch.)

The communications snafu cost Visteon a shot at getting off to a good start on its Section 404 reporting: management concludes that the lapse of communication constitutes a material weakness in internal controls, and they will not be able to conclude that said internal controls are effective as of December 21, 2004 (the only day that matters.) The firm's management expects to receive an adverse opinion on its internal controls from auditor PwC - just like Eastman Kodak.

If Sam DiPiazza is right, they'll have plenty of company. Soon.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.