Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jan 28

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
1/28/2005 1:17 PM 

In the past couple years, companies have been required to disclose the accounting policies that they consider to be most "critical" in terms of the effects they have on earnings or are most subject to a high degree of estimation. In surveying the S&P 500 the past couple of years, I've noticed one common policy/estimate termed critical by many companies: self-insurance estimates. In and of itself, that's not worrisome: investors should understand that it's a fact of life, a necessity in dealing with workmen's compensation liability, expected legal settlements and the like. The troubling aspect of it is that any discussion of these policy/estimates ends right there. No numbers, no further details available: sorry, nobody required us to do that.

Last March 15, the Wall Street Journal ran a story on Goodyear's restatement of earnings from 1999 to 2003, due in part to an understatement of "workers' compensation claims accruals at a single U.S. plant." (If you want the story, you have to pay for it. Key in on the headline "Outside Audit: The Red Flag Called 'Self Insurance' Goodyear's Restatement Is Warning for Investors" by Theo Francis & Timothy Aeppel.)

It now looks like Goodyear isn't the only company in a scrape over such accruals, according to the WSJ. Here's an excerpt from Interstate Bakeries' 8-K filed today:

"Interstate Bakeries Corporation (OTC: IBCIQ.PK) today announced that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a formal order of private investigation into issues that were the subject of a previously announced informal inquiry by the SEC. The formal investigation appears to concern matters related to a previously announced investigation by the Company's audit committee into the Company's manner for setting its workers' compensation reserves and other reserves."


As you peruse the upcoming annual reports, it would be wise to keep your thinking sharp and critical when you're dealing with labor-intensive companies making workers' comp accruals. If a firm can't do more than mention them and other "self-insurance accruals" as mere boilerplate MD&A disclosures, are they really being forthright with their shareholders? And if they're not - what's going on in those accounts?

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.