Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jan 26

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
1/26/2005 11:10 AM 

There's bound to be more and more news about the Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 internal control reviews as the first-ever reporting period looms. Some of the more intriguing stories today:

- At the World Economic Summit in Davos, Switzerland, PricewaterhouseCoopers Chief Executive Sam DiPiazza hazarded his guess that 10% of U.S. companies will either report that they couldn't complete the review in time for their 2004 annual report, or found internal control weaknesses. (WSJ link here.)

- In a speech delivered at the London School of Economics yesterday, SEC Chairman Bill Donaldson announced that he has asked the Commission staff to consider delaying the internal control reporting requirements for non-US filers.

- Finally, an item with a Sarbanes-Oxley flavor, but not related to Section 404 reports: the American Enterprise Institute issued a white paper recommending that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board be folded into the SEC within five years.

There's a Sarbanes-Oxley backlash movement building; expect to see more of this kind of thinking emerge.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.