Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jun 26

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
6/26/2006 6:33 AM 

We'll find out soon. This week, we'll see the launch of the first batch of ESOARS offered to the public. ESOARS stands for "Employee Stock Option Appreciation Rights Securities", and Zions Bank is the first firm to offer these strange new securities.

(Strangely named securities too - ESOARS? If they don't work out for investors, you can be sure the nickname will be "Eyesores." An even worse association: the childhood literary figure "Eeyore."

What are they? You probably noticed the article in the Wall Street Journal describing them as "another stab at 'public' options." It's not a bad description. They're essentially asset-backed securities that represent hoped-for cash payments from the exercise of employee stock options. That makes them all or nothing kind of securities: no exercise of options, no cash to be passed through to the security holders. So, the pricing of these things will be an exercise in option modeling. And they won't be traded in any secondary market after the offering, so the offering will be a pretty critical measure of the value of the securities.

That's because Zions hopes that it can use the price of these "reference securities" in its calculation of Statement 123(R) stock option compensation expense. Last year, Cisco Systems tried to build a very private market for a somewhat similar security, to be used for the same end. The SEC turned down Cisco's approach, and it had to stick with more traditional estimation of option fair values in calculating its 123(R) compensation expense. This time it's a more visible market, at least for the moment of the offering. Whether or not the values gleaned from that market are permitted to be used in the financial statements remains to be seen.





Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.