Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Jun 20

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
6/20/2006 5:30 AM 

Well, maybe "friendly" is pushing it. Slightly less hostile might be more like it.

Long-time critic of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 Paul Atkins delivered a speech to the French Association Of Corporate Governance last Thursday via satellite. French-fluent readers of this blog can find his remarks at the SEC website through this link. In French. For the rest of us bumpkins who ne savons pas parler en français, the English link is here.

(And if you're curious as to how well those "translate" websites work, Monsieur Google provides this link so you can compare. Vaguely amusing.)

Commissioner Atkins rarely misses an opportunity to bash the PCAOB's Auditing Standard No. 2, and he didn't give it a bye this time, either. But what was surprising was his near-admission of the importance of SOX as a whole, as expressed in this excerpt:

"... I am confident that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act can offer considerable benefits to shareholders. The emphasis on good controls over financial reporting is laudable. Section 404 focuses on the integrity of financial information and seeks to give shareholders additional insight into the credibility of financial statements... Our job — as regulators — is to ensure that the law's goal of improving the reliability of corporate financial reports is achieved in a rational and realistic manner, and that definitions of terms such as "material weaknesses" actually have meaning..."


If only he would have stopped there. But at least it was refreshing to hear the commissioner's general optimism about the future moderation of SOX 404 and auditing procedures instead of calling for their abolition. Unless it was lost in the translation.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.