Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Apr 28

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
4/28/2006 9:16 AM 

Newt Gingrich testified a couple days ago before the House Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises, offering his views on what it takes to keep America competitive. And he floated a very bad idea:

"6. Examine Stock Options. The Congress should revisit the decision by the Federal Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to require the expensing of employee stock options (ESOs) by firms that issue options to their employees. A way should be found for startups and small companies to revert to the older model of stock options..."

Note to Newt: it's the FINANCIAL Accounting Standards Board, not the FEDERAL Accounting Standards Board.

And there's no reason stock options accounting needs to revert to the way things used to be - when shareholders didn't see in the income statement what they were paying hired help. Which is where pay belongs.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.