Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Apr 26

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
4/26/2006 6:14 AM 

Yesterday, SEC Chairman Christopher Cox testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. His speech homed in on the fact that most investors in the United States are no longer the upper income elite, but are member of the typical households where investment decisions are made at the kitchen table along with budget and spending decisions. He outlined a four-point initiative for his Commission to complete in order to serve these individual investors better. His plan:

1. Moving from boilerplate legalese to plain English in every document intended for retail consumption;

2. Moving from long, hard-to-read disclosure documents to easy-to-navigate Web pages that let investors click through to find what they want;

3. Reducing the complexity of accounting rules and regulations; and

4. Focusing our anti-fraud efforts on scams that target older Americans.

Of course 2) and 3) are most interesting to folks with interests like ours. There was precious little in Chairman Cox's remarks that was new, however; the comments on reducing forms and developing interactive data were a good compendium of what has already been discussed by Cox and other SEC officials in various forums. These remarks however, still did not include any timetable for progress or any mention of milestone events.

The same could be said for his remarks on reducing complexity of accounting rules. He mentioned the SEC's off-balance sheet financing study released last summer; we know that it will take years for the FASB to remedy the issues named in it. He also addressed the "codification project" which will bring all accounting principles under one roof - another multi-year (multi-decade?) project.

Yet there was one topic conspicuously absent from the Chairman's testimony, one key part in getting at least part 3 of his four-part machine humming: the selection of a chief accountant. The Commission has been operating without a permanent chief accountant for about six months. One has to wonder: is it that hard to find someone who wants the job?

One also wonders: is the selection going to take place after the decision on 404 exemptions is made by the Commission? This could be a complicating factor in finding a candidate: any prospectives who have been contacted might be waiting to see where this goes. It would have a pretty direct bearing on the nature of the chief accountant's role for the remainder of Cox's tenure. If the small cappers must follow the 404 rules, there's going to be "natural policing" of those registrants by their internal controls and the private sector - their auditors. If the small cappers get their exemptions, then the SEC - including the chief accountant's office - will probably find themselves dealing with more frequent accounting issues among small fry.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.