Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Apr 25

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
4/25/2006 6:20 AM 

An especially gratifying e-mail, from the controller of a private company who would prefer not to be identified at all:

How come I agree with so many of your posts, especially the ones on SOX exemptions and the Small Company Advisory Board?

Based on our respective positions (preparer and analyst), aren't we supposed to be sworn enemies, on opposite sides of the hide and seek game?Oh, wait. I forgot. I am also an investor. Oh, wait again. I forgot, I also need to access capital in the markets, even if it is currently only plain vanilla bank debt. I guess I am foolishly still holding out for that mythical level playing field for all the smaller companies that I compete with for access to debt financing.

I think that an important story for everybody to remember is what Michael Armstrong did at AT&T, taking all those risks to try to match those wonderful results achieved by his insightful, innovative and brilliant competitors at WorldCom. And we know how well that turned out. Of course I realize that such things obviously could never happen at companies below $128M (or $787M as long as the companies themselves give us a blood oath promise that everything is under control, just do not look behind the curtain.)

I don't know. I hope that I do not have to turn in my membership in the Preparer's Club for thinking these thoughts.

Well, I'd like to think that you agree with me because I'm a reasonable guy with incredible powers of persuasion. But I don't believe that any more than you do.

I think we agree because, as you point out, we're all investors at some level or another - and out of our own self-interest, we're better off when we have consistent, reliable financial statements on which we can base our investing homework. The capital markets should be just that - markets - and not casinos where investors not only have to find companies that meet their investment criteria, but they also must pick the companies whose financials they find most believable.

Reliable financial statements, prepared with integrity, let investors get on with their work of investing - and in turn, create healthy markets where capital is allocated best in the broad economy. I sincerely hope you retain your membership in the Preparer's Club - and that you infect a few more of your fellow members.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.