Text/HTML
Text/HTML
If you are a registered user please log in to see more postings.
 

The AAO Weblog covers accounting issues and current events as they relate the practice of investment analysis.

 
 
Dec 23

Written by: Jack Ciesielski
12/23/2005 8:25 AM 

If that greeting isn't one you like, please feel free to insert your own - as long as it's in the spirit that this greeting is given. Which is to say, camaraderie, companionship, and cheerfulness. The Three C's: they're not bad all year long.

No post today, or for the next week, for that matter. Serious downtime needed here, as I'm sure it's needed by you, too. Big plans today: I'm going to get my CDs in order. They're here in the stacks of paper to be read or tossed.

And I'm going to read those things or toss them in the next week. Small pleasures, like those, have the most weight at this time of year, as far as I'm concerned.

Thanks for reading the AAO Weblog this past year. I hope you've enjoyed it, and I look forward to writing more for you in the new year.

Tags:
 

Pension & Other Benefit Plans: A Look Ahead


    Investors in firms with defined benefit pension plans always face the risk of suddenly being pushed farther back in line when it comes to being served their returns. Variability in plan assets and variability in benefit plan obligations are the reason: poor asset returns coupled with sinking interest rates always spell tough times for defined benefit plan funding. In that regard, this year’s asset returns combined with the Fed’s “Operation Twist” add up to “Operation Agony” for defined benefit pension plans. If trends continue along their current path, firms that may have anticipated moving to more realistic pension accounting - like Honeywell, AT&T and Verizon already have done - might forego that decision. It could be just too painful. 

    Pensions aren’t the only kind of benefit plan affected by Operation Twist. Other postemployment benefit (OPEB) plans share much the same accounting model as pensions, including the calculation of a projected benefit obligation that similarly incorporates a discount rate - one that will also be affected by Operation Twist. The net OPEB obligations were slightly less than pension obligations at the end of 2010, but also promise to grow in 2011. Investors perceive them as less threatening than pension obligations because they don’t require funding. Strangely, there are a number of firms that are recognizing income from these benefit plans - without ever creating a dime of cash for investors.

A recent edition of The Analyst’s Accounting Observer dissects these issues, and is available only to paid subscribers. A condensed version is available for free upon request. To receive it, send an e-mail to Brenda Rappold at brappold@accountingobserver.com, with “PENSIONS” in the subject line.

For information about subscribing to The Analyst’s Accounting Observer, click here.